turkish very horny big dick.https://www.hdsexjizz.com
rafaella ferrari e edu.https://www.getxxxvideos.net magic ebony boobs.

Peer review process

Ethics and Publication Statement

All the articles submitted shall undergo an editorial review and then double blind reviews by at least 2 reviewers selected by the organizing committee to ensure the quality of the accepted research article.The papers should be strictly aligned to the journal scope and authors guidelines.There is also opportunity to copyright your document. The team will also recommend your written documents for copyright filing and publication.

Peer review process

Each manuscript presented in the conference will go for double blind review. Initially all the manuscripts will be checked through Turnitin software for plagiarism check. Plagiarism should be strictly less than 10%.
First round of review:
During the first round of review both the reviewers will check the manuscript as per parameters of the review which include: research methodology (quantitative/qualitative), objectives, analysis and discussion, relation between objectives and conclusion etc. The reviewers will give one decision out of four: accept, minor revision, major revision, reject.
Afterwards the authors will revise the manuscript as per the reviewer’s decision.

Second round of review:
During the second round of review, the reviewers whether the authors have answered all the comments stated in first round and is it fit for acceptance now or it still needs a revision.
Afterwards the authors will submit final paper and it will again be checked for plagiarism through Turnitin software.